Sara Duterte is bisexual according to Mon Tulfo Sara and Zuleika have been lovers for a long time

 

Ramon Tulfo's Explosive Claim: Sara Duterte's Gender and Relationship Under Scrutiny

A controversial social media post by veteran journalist Ramon Tulfo on November 23, 2024, has ignited a firestorm of discussion and speculation regarding the gender identity and personal relationships of Vice President Sara Duterte. In a message written in Tagalog, Tulfo questioned why Vice President Duterte was seemingly reluctant to leave her Chief of Staff, Zuleika Lopez, who had been detained at the Batasang Pambansa in connection with inquiries into the Vice President's confidential and intelligence funds.

Tulfo's post, which has since been widely circulated and debated online, directly addressed this question with a startling claim. He stated, "Ok, ito ang sagot: si Sara at Zuleika ay matagal magkasintahan." (Okay, here's the answer: Sara and Zuleika have been lovers for a long time.)

He went on to assert his belief about the Vice President's sexual orientation, writing, "Di ba ninyo nahahalata? Sara is a dyke or lesbian. Tomboy or AC-DC siya. Puwedeng sa lalake at sa babae. Siya ay bisexual." (Didn't you notice? Sara is a dyke or lesbian. She's a tomboy or AC-DC. She can be with men and women. She is bisexual.)

Tulfo further claimed that this alleged relationship between Vice President Duterte and her Chief of Staff was common knowledge in Davao, where the Duterte family has a long-standing political presence.

Reactions and Implications:

Tulfo's post has been met with a wide range of reactions. Supporters of Vice President Duterte and many in the public have criticized the post as being invasive, disrespectful, and potentially defamatory. They argue that a person's sexual orientation is a private matter and should not be used for political commentary or to explain official actions. Critics have also pointed out the lack of concrete evidence presented by Tulfo to support his claims.

Conversely, some have viewed Tulfo's statement as a potentially significant revelation, given Vice President Duterte's prominent position in Philippine politics. The discussion has touched upon themes of privacy, public interest, and the role of media in reporting on the personal lives of public figures.

No Official Statement:

As of the current date, there has been no official statement from Vice President Sara Duterte or her office directly addressing the claims made by Ramon Tulfo. Zuleika Lopez has also not publicly commented on the matter. 

Ethical Considerations:

The incident raises significant ethical questions for journalism and public discourse. The line between legitimate public interest in the actions and accountability of public officials and the unwarranted intrusion into their private lives is often debated. Critics argue that Tulfo's post crosses this line by focusing on personal relationships and sexual orientation, which they deem irrelevant to the issue of public funds.

Moving Forward:

The aftermath of Tulfo's post continues to unfold. It remains to be seen what, if any, further repercussions this will have on the political landscape and public perception of Vice President Sara Duterte. The incident serves as a stark reminder of the power of social media to disseminate potentially sensitive and controversial information rapidly and the ethical responsibilities that come with such platforms for both content creators and consumers.

It is crucial to note that the claims made by Ramon Tulfo remain unverified and are presented here for the sole purpose of reporting on the controversy they have generated. Responsible discourse requires a clear distinction between allegations and confirmed facts, especially when dealing with sensitive personal matters.